The readers' thoughts are a bit like watching the magic of the Spring Festival Gala...

The first time I watched the magic trick, I was shocked.

After knowing the principle, readers suddenly realized it, but they inevitably felt that it was just like this.

They feel that they have completely realized it.

If Chu Kuang was writing a similar novel (performing similar magic), they would definitely be able to find the murderer (exposing the magic)!

Similar psychology is not only available to readers.

Leng Guang, a troll writer who publicly criticized the weird and insulting reasoning online, also had such an idea!

"I will prove that the so-called narration is just a little trick after all!"

With such belief, Leng Guang clicked in as soon as the Chu Kuang Reasoning short story was released.

[The Spring Festival is approaching and I am still worried about some things. An uninvited guest came to my home. This is a young man. I always think he looks familiar, but I don’t know where I have seen him. He calls himself Mr. C.]

Like "Roger's Mission".

This novel is also the first person "I".

The name of "I" is Chu Kuang, and he is a well-known writer who has written some mystery novels.

"Take yourself as the protagonist?"

Leng Guang raised his eyebrows, which felt quite interesting.

He didn't know that Quinn, the great mystery writer on earth, was also called "Queen".

This day.

A young writer wrote a mystery novel, found Chu Kuang, and challenged Chu Kuang:

"Can you guess the murderer before the answer is announced?"

Leng Guang raised his eyebrows again.

With a straightforward style, the reasoning writer Chu Kuang reasoned about mystery novels.

It has a bit of a play in the play.

In this way, the murderer cannot be "me", because "me" is a spectator outside of reasoning.

Just think about it, even if Chu Kuang continues to write reasoning, he will not be able to use the setting that "I" is the murderer.

Keep watching.

The cases described in mystery novels are not complicated.

There are three groups of people in the story.

They are the Leng Guang clan who lives in Dongdong Village;

There was also a group of college students who came to visit, one of which was named Chu Kuang;

The last group was Carter and his dog, meatballs.

Cold light was speechless.

What's the fuck?

Villagers of Dongdong Village, Leng Guang clan?

Cold light?

Use my name?

And college student Chu Kuang?

Even Chu Kuang himself was written into the novel?

So Chu Kuang is still the murderer?

Even Carter is there.

The names of many writers in the mystery world appear in the novel, and Chu Kuang actually teased many famous writers in the mystery world in the novel.

Leng Guang wanted to complain, but he didn't know where to complain...

And Leng Guang quickly dispelled his suspicion of Chu Kuang in the book.

Because Chu Kuang is the victim.

The description of Chu Kuang in the novel is too much, saying that Chu Kuang is a bad boy, often does bad things and is naughty because he is young and does not even have the concept of good or evil.

As a result, this bad boy Chu Kuang was pushed down from the Dongdong Bridge.

If this novel was not written by Chu Kuang, Leng Guang almost doubted whether the author had a grudge against "Chu Kuang"? The evil ones are so cruel.

The only links between the two sides of the valley are Dongdong Suspension Bridge and the single-plank bridge? There are no channels such as secret passages.

At the end of the case, the author listed all the alibi certificates investigated.

The alibi certificate for each suspect is very detailed? It is neatly like a case book.

Among them? Carter is a witness.

"In these two and a half hours, the single-plank bridge was within the sight of Maruko and me (Carter's dog)? I dare to assert that no one walked across the bridge during this period."

Because Carter was thinking about life by the bridge at that time? So he witnessed all this.

A sentence is emphasized in the novel:

These witnesses and absenteeism are completely correct.

"I'm dizzy."

Leng Guang thought for five minutes? Suddenly he patted his thigh hard.

He seemed to have made something wrong.

This novel does not seem to be a narrative style?

It seems that Chu Kuang never said from beginning to end that "Falling of Dongdong Suspension Bridge" is a narrative and confusing reasoning!

But everyone subconsciously thought that Chu Kuang's new work would continue to write narratives.

Even I thought so before.

Thinking of this, Leng Guang smiled.

Is it evil to be a trait? Chu Kuang also knows that turning back is the shore.

In the novel, "Chu Kuang" died. Perhaps it was Chu Kuang who used this metaphor to imply that his writing of narration was "doing bad things"?

very good!

This is confession!

We are still good friends if we don’t write a narrative.

Next, let me guess the murderer!

Leng Guang quickly started a brainstorm for the reasoning writer.

I have to say, this challenge? There are still difficulties.

The Dongdong Bridge was half-destroyed, and even the size of a short school child could not bear it? It is impossible for adults to live with it.

And there is Carter's certificate.

How did the murderer kill "Chu Kuang"?

You know, this novel also drew a topographic map of the murder scene? It is very detailed so that readers can see the specific situation at a glance.

"It's him!"

It took about half an hour to think? Leng Guang suddenly guessed the murderer.

That is Chu Kuang’s companion? A college student named A Rong.

This is the only one who has no absent proof!

And? Leng Guang also guessed the method of committing the crime.

"Did you guess it?"

Leng Guang quickly continued to look down.

What made Leng Guang feel that "I" guessed the same answer.

As a result, the young writer said that Chu Kuang was wrong!

And it's a big mistake!

Because the real murderer is Leng Guang!

That is, the patriarch of the Leng Guang clan!

"How is that possible!"

Leng Guang felt confused.
To be continued...