(Special note: A brief explanation of the Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors mentioned in "Attacking Taiwei ● Chapter 231 First Entering Tusang") 1

——————————————————————————————————

1    Special note: Regarding the brief explanation of the Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors mentioned in "Abbott Taiwei ● Chapter 231 First Entering Tusang". I thought about this explanation over and over again, but I still think I would like to explain to my friends who read this book to avoid saying that the author is nonsense without basis. I admit that the Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors I listed are nonsense, but it is definitely not unfounded nonsense. The reason why I did not quote the classics is because those classics cannot provide a unified basis. Not to mention anything else, there are almost ten lists of the Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors alone, not me, because I am not old, and I guess it is possible to be considered a one-man statement, and it will take a thousand years to wait. If someone denies it because it is inconsistent with the classics

My list, so please explain which one is your basis? This is not out of the box, right? But in this case, you must refute those classics that are different from you. They have been buried underground. How to argue with them is a technical problem. Of course, you can ask Hua Xiansheng for help. You can borrow a personal motorcycle to travel freely. However, Hua Xiansheng agreed with me, and your answer to borrow a car would satisfy him. Another thing is that nonsense is to talk about the mountains and set up the dragon gate formation. This becomes the climate of Master Yuan and Teacher Shan’s storytelling, and then become the four masterpieces of Shi Nai'an, Cao Xueqin and others, and Jin Daxia’s Flying Snow Shooting White Deer and other things. So don’t underestimate the nonsense technology.

Returning to the book, I chose the Three Emperors, Youchao, Suiren, and Fuxi. The reason is already secretly expressed in the book. Let me emphasize here that although they exist in legends, I think they must be historical figures. It depends on their contributions. People are grateful to them, which leads to word of mouth. My personal task is that they were ancestors of the earliest days, and they did not have a clear relationship of generations. They were ancestors of human beings, and it was true that they made great contributions to human beings. Another point is that these three characters are not sure, but only those groups of people. These three families are their representatives, and those contributions may not be caused by them, but they must be done by the people they represent. This represents the hard work and creativity of the ancestors of China and their hardships. The essence of such a divine nature can be recognized, which is enough to inspire future generations. We contemporary people should not learn from the mechanical philology that the Confucius and Mencius had been working hard for a lifetime and could not understand a word.

Regarding the Five Emperors, my choice is Yan Emperor, Huang Emperor, Yao, Shun, and Yu. The most important one is the first two and the next one. The first two are either among the Three Emperors or are not included. I don’t know how those people think. It is obvious that Yan Emperor and Huang Emperor are called this. What’s the reason for them to be within the Five Emperors. People in later generations only know how to echo and not know their own thoughts, which is even more important. Now, because the two emperors of Yan and Huang were excluded, two unknown people were added. People even don’t know how to pronounce their names? Don’t you know that people who have not been passed down can’t act as ancestors of the Chinese? Also, what is our general name? Are the descendants of Yan and Huang? How can Yan and Huang be called Yan and Huang descendants? As the Master taught, the name is not legitimate and unsatisfactory!

The last Five Emperors, Yu, is the most orthodox emperor in history, there is no doubt that why is it not included in the Five Emperors? This is another reason for Confucius' standards, and all his elders must take the blame. The reason is very simple, because Xia Chuanzi's family is in the world, so Yu is unqualified, because according to the standards of Confucius, the way to pass the throne must be abdicated, and it cannot be given to his son, especially when the son is not in tune with it. Why do you say that? Because Yao and Shun's abdication were also a grant of national affairs among family members. After being evaluated and approved by Confucius, there is no problem.

Confucius did not recognize history if he did not meet his own standards. I think it is not desirable. History is history. The order of the Five Emperors is about Yao, Shun and Yu. Yao was passed down to Yao, Yao was passed down to Shun, Shun and Yu, Yu was passed down to Yu, and Yu was passed down to his son. The Three Emperors and Five Emperors ended in Yu, but loyal to history must include Yu, instead of excluding him because he had flaws. The history that Hu Shi mentioned was a little girl dressed up, referring to the history of writing, not history itself. Thank you for listening to my family's words. Of course, I think it is a family, but it is not, but my personal opinion.
Chapter completed!