To understand the finale of the young Pi, you must first be clear about the finale written by the author. ≤≤Little≤Say,

Of course, maybe you think that the finale written by the author is the real finale

No, sometimes the finale written by the author is not entirely the finale.

Or sometimes the author writes the finale, but people do not understand what the author says is the finale.

Or, even though the author wrote the finale, it was just a trick on you.

The first person to come forward to analyze "Boyant Pi" was Galaxy Film's screenwriter David.

Although David had already learned the finale in advance under Huang Yifan's prompt. However, after David read the finale of the Young Pi, he realized that the real finale was not that simple.

According to the hy's writing style, the finale of the Young Pi is that there are no animals on the ship, all of them are humans.

These people are Buddhists, chefs, mothers, and teenagers.

The cook killed the Buddhists and his mother, and the young pie eventually killed the cook.

So, the tiger is the teenager.

However, the ending of this story is not as simple as killing or being killed.

You should know that although the fantasy floating of the young Pi has a lot of practical significance, it still belongs to the wilderness survival type. Therefore, whether it is killed or killed, their essence is to survive. Obviously, killing people does not mean that they can survive. In order to survive, there can only be one way. This way is to find food.

In the vast ocean, there is no tool, so how can there be any food?

Even if the chef uses fishing methods on Pi, this method may not necessarily catch fish.

When there was no food and the environment pushed people to the edge of the road, a scary scene appeared.

Eat human flesh.

Yes.

The chef was the first to start eating human flesh.

The chef not only used Buddhist meat to fish, but also ate Buddhist meat.

Why do you start eating human flesh first? Because, besides the chef who ate human flesh, there are also people who ate it.

This person is the protagonist, that is, the young Pi.

Although the protagonist did not say that he had eaten other people's meat, the protagonist said: "I dealt with him like a chef dealing with a Buddhist." Obviously, the chef dealing with a Buddhist does not mean killing him. If so, he would say killing him directly. At the same time, the death of a Buddhist amputation is not considered a murder, it can only be regarded as an accident. However, eating a Buddhist's meat cannot be regarded as an accident.

After all, humans are humans, and humans are not animals.

People are human, and people will not eat the meat of their companions.

If you eat your companion’s meat, what’s the difference between a person and an animal?

This is what the protagonist said.

However, the reason why this work is classic is that what the protagonist says is not necessarily true.

When the protagonist killed the chef, the protagonist also ate the chef's meat.

However, the real ending is not just a sentence, we also need to figure out why the protagonist wants to eat the chef's meat.

Maybe everyone will say that this seems easy to understand. Because the chef killed his mother, the protagonist killed the chef and ate the chef's meat in order to avenge his mother.

Although this seems reasonable, if you think about it carefully, you will find that this is not reasonable at all.

First: The protagonist is a believer who believes in Buddhism, Christianity, and religion. Well, although the protagonist cannot be regarded as a very devout believer, he is at least more kind and more human than ordinary people. Moreover, the protagonist usually doesn’t even eat meat and only eats vegetarian food. Although he can’t eat fish later, eating fish and eating people are two different things.

Second: Although the chef killed the protagonist's mother, the chef did not eat the protagonist's mother's meat. This is the most critical point, so even if the protagonist hates the chef who killed his mother, the most thing the protagonist has to do is to avenge his mother. He can kill the chef, but it has nothing to do with eating the chef's meat. Under normal logic, there will be no idea of ​​eating the chef's meat.

So, based on two points, the protagonist has no reason to eat human flesh.

So, what made him eat human flesh

The truth is officially announced at this time.

Survive.

Is there any difference between humans and animals

As mentioned before, there is a difference.

Animals are only animalistic, and humans are human.

Human nature and animal nature are the biggest difference between humans and animals.

But, let’s not forget that humans are animals in fact.

When survival is subject to a great test, human nature will degenerate into animal nature.

Although the animal nature is a bit bad, it is human instinct.

No matter what creature is, even if it is a human, his instinct will do whatever it takes to survive.

As long as you can survive, you can do anything.

When the protagonist, the young Pi was almost hungry, the young Pi chose to eat the chef's meat.

Of course, when making the decision to eat human flesh, the young Pi still experienced a lot of struggle.

The protagonist also said this sentence: Sometimes I feel happy because of the existence of "Richard" and even don't want him to die. If he dies, then I will survive alone in despair. Despair is an enemy that is more terrifying than a tiger. This sentence not only gives us a sensation that the protagonist is a tiger, but also gives the protagonist the answer to why he eats human flesh.

The analysis of screenwriter "David" can be said to have opened a window for the interpretation of Pi. When the brand new analysis was released, readers were shocked by this story again at this moment.

"I originally thought the story of the young Pi was complicated enough, but I didn't expect there was something more complicated."

"I was convinced. After reading David's analysis, I realized that I had finished reading the young Pi word for word, but I didn't understand the true meaning of this story at all."

"This is the cleverness of the author Hy. You can regard this story as a story of survival in the wilderness. Just like the protagonist finally told the writer, do you like tigers or don't have tigers? The writer answered that there are tigers. Now think about it, compared to the real story, the plot with tigers is so charming."

Many readers kept talking about it after seeing the analysis.

However, David didn't know that he thought his new analysis truly explained the story of the young Pi. But even he did not expect that when his new analysis came out, more doubts were dug out by countless readers.

"If the chef eats Buddhist meat, then did the chef eat the protagonist's mother's meat?"

"Why did the protagonist's mother slap the chef at the beginning, but the chef didn't turn back"

"There is another question, where has the protagonist's father been?"

"Yes, there is also the protagonist's brother. After they wrote it in the front, there is nothing behind it?"

"What does the cannibal island mean? What does the animals, flowers, and teeth above it mean?"

"Why didn't the tiger look back when parting with the protagonist, but went directly into the mountains and forests without a trace of reluctance."

At this time, countless readers no longer regard the Young Pi as a fantasy and adventure work. After a series of truths were announced, a series of readers were surprisingly discovering. Every sentence, every plot, and every action in the entire novel is not casually spoken or written, but also has metaphors. In addition to making readers admire Hy's invincible writing skills again, these metaphors also create more questions.
Chapter completed!