"According to Mr. Chen's words, the classification of natural science can be changed."

"Now some people use the difference between flowers in classification, some use the difference between leaves, and some do not divide them at all, but think that there is not much connection in it, just need to classify all plants."

"How is the classification correct? I personally think that there is no correctness or incorrectness, only whether it is accepted by everyone. And these are all artificially distinguished."

"Isn't it ridiculous to think that Mr. Chen and his gangsters artificially divide people into different classes and think that this is the same as the method of division of plants according to flowers, which helps to make them a systematic and scientific division?"

"In fact, what is a class? No one can see it, nor does a paint called class dye everyone."

"This is like plants. Why do we have to become a system? Why can't we admit that all seemingly similar animals and plants are different? Why should we classify whales as mammals? Why can't we think that all the fins swimming in the water are fish?"

"If science is about classification, it is about drawing different labels and pasting them, and calling it a system to facilitate research and summarize the common points, I think this is a fork in the road."

"It's not that it's wrong, but that this is just a research method, and it cannot prove that this classification method is unique, correct, or that only such a classification is helpful for research."

"If we look at what Mr. Chen calls all things and matter first, people are human beings, and people are the same people, but different classes are divided according to the so-called land and machines that other matters that people have mastered."

"But in fact, why is Mr. Chen so sure that there is no material thing that is difficult to explain, spiritual, and spiritual? This kind of thing creates different cultures, different languages, different skin colors, different habits, etc. Why can't it be divided into different ethnic groups, different races, different spirits, and different minds?"

"In fact, whales are not fish, which is also artificially divided. But what are fish? Isn't it defined by humans? If I defined fish as species that swim in the water with fins, tails and hairs, wouldn't whales be fish?"

"In this way, you can see that things that take for granted are not so natural. Mr. Chen and his fellow disciples call this division method the right way, and then secretly make people think that their division method is also correct."

"Looking at Mr. Chen's previous articles, he reveals this ambition to master the right to speak everywhere. He wants to unify everything, a unified naming method, a unified vocabulary translation method, a unified division and distinction between animal and plant categories, and a unified naming method of inseparable things..."

"If these are all progress for future aspects, it is understandable, and I personally support it. But he wants to unify the foundation of understanding the world, which is terrible and goes against human freedom. As I said before, the basis of defining some things determines everything afterwards, such as the fish I have already mentioned before, and putting it in the whole world, it is the view and view of the foundation of the world. This is dangerous."

"According to Mr. Chen's microparticles, it seems that naturalistic transformation and decomposition do not require the separation of organic and inorganic matters. Because he believes that the essence of life does not exist, so the foundation does not exist, so this division method is wrong and unnecessary."

"He even made fun of it that this is just a way to divide people and ducks according to whether they have two legs, and asked me to give a summary definition of the so-called 'organic', just like the birds defined by those of them, otherwise it would be meaningless."

"However, is it really meaningless? Will thinking of a bat as a bird affect the operation of the whole world? If not, where is his so-called meaning? Now he has to define whether there is meaning or not, who does he think he is?"

"Indeed, according to the so-called definition of similarities, it is meaningful to divide it in his world in this way. My definition of organic matter is indeed inaccurate and loopholes. He can easily point out that carbonic acid gas is transformed by animals and plants, and water is necessary for animals and plants. These seem to be divided into organic matter, so he unilaterally declared his victory, because indeed these things can be synthesized with inorganic matters."

"Indeed, if I say that only the essence of life can be converted is the definition of organic matter, and I need to verify and list all the "inorganic matters", then Mr. Chen can face the challenge. However, we all know that the number of things in the world is vast and infinite, and even if I exhaust my whole life's strength, it will be difficult to complete the sorting. From this perspective, he seems to be invincible."

"He asked me again: vinegar, this is made of food, and so far no one can combine it with any nature without the transformation of the 'element of life'. He said that according to my definition, this must be considered an organic substance."

"He asked: But is it meaningful to divide vinegar into organic matter for us to study vinegar? According to the current division method, vinegar is acid, so it can be neutralized with alkali, so it can react with sodium carbonate to release carbonic acid gas, etc. But he asked me, what can transform vinegar into organic matter? In addition to bringing this thing that has been converted through the essence of life, is it meaningful to the research itself?"

"He asked again, if all similarities are only transformed through the essence of life, then it is not very meaningful, because only such a large and transformed similarity cannot do anything meaningful with these similarities."

"He even said that the only meaning of my doing this is to prove that there is something transcendent and beyond matter. If this thing does not exist, or it does not exist in the future, then this division is meaningless."

"However, I want to say that the word "may be meaningless" in his so-called "maybe meaningless" is the greatest meaning, because this is the basis of the world and our view of understanding the world."

"But, everyone, is there anything more meaningful than shaping the worldview? What he calls meaninglessness is just a conceited belief that the worldview he understands is correct, so I say this is meaningless. But what if he is wrong? If there is something like the essence of life, wouldn't it be a complete change of our view of the world? How could this be meaningless?"

"In his opinion, the macro world only has matter and energy. In Minjun, where his theory is sought after, some people arrogantly believe that only energy is enough, and as long as the method is right, the whole world can be created. What an arrogant mentality is this? People who look at the world in this way will lack humanity and fear of the whole world, which will cause the world to fall into unmoral chaos."

"So, since that's the case, please let Mr. Chen let us see with our own eyes a hope, a kind of insurmountable gap between life and non-life, even a little hope."

"In that case, even if it cannot be proved that the essence of life may not exist or may not exist, it at least proves that Mr. Chen's view of the world is a little basis...at least, it may not be wrong."

"And now, Mr. Chen cannot prove that my statement is wrong. He can only prove that his statement is right and worth believing."

"Even if he teases that way, I am invincible according to his theory. He cannot prove that the essence of life does not exist, but I can easily find tasks that are difficult for him to complete. For example, if he is asked to use inorganic substances to create individuals, he will definitely not be able to create them."

"So, what Mr. Chen wants to prove now is not that I am wrong, but that he is just as good as possible to prove that he may be right. This is the only thing that can be done and the only rational choice."

Faced with this aggressive and quibbling reply, Chen Jian quickly gave a very simple reply.

There are only two words.
Chapter completed!