A year later, the experimental results were out of the cage. As the basic anti-deductionists concluded, the pendulum in the southern mountainous areas was equal to the northern canyon depression, and the pendulum clocks were less swinging for many days. On average, they had to swing seventy fewer swings a day.

In fact, this is not a perfect experiment, because there are two variables rather than a single variable in this experiment, the geocentric distance and rotation centrifugal force.

Some people have indeed criticized it, but in the amazement of everyone, this was obviously an unforgivable mistake in the experiment. It has become a harmless little thing. In fact, this experiment cannot prove that all the conclusions they want to get exist, but it can only prove that the conclusions they want to get exist, but it is unclear which one is still all.

But even this experiment, which made major mistakes, also determined the correctness of the basic theories Chen Jian said: even though the errors of the two variables in the experiment were selected, it is undeniable that the basis of these two variables was the system proposed by Chen Jian. It was either the relationship between distance and gravity; or the balance between centrifugal force and reaction force. It was just a mistake within the system, not a loophole that was enough to overturn the system logic.

This three-year debate and experiment not only brought sensation, but also brought many citizens to watch the fun, brought secret gambling, brought more accurate gravity acceleration values, and also brought about a revolution in timing devices.

Since the pendulum has isochronicity, since the pendulum swing cycle has formulas, and since the pendulum cycle time is an unchangeable mathematical time, the clocks with single pendulum as the basis of the new timing device have also become various watchmakers and craftsmen's research directions, and more craftsmen came to Fujian City with new ideas to devote themselves to the "precision watch manufacturing plan" that was said to have successful 50,000 silver coins and oil workshop stocks.

Chen Jian believes that this is one of the two most important things in the scientific circle in the past few years he went abroad.

It is not a single pendulum cycle formula that he can copy, or an extremely close gravity acceleration value or a pendulum clock.

Instead, a whole set of logical deductions and traditional observation experience confrontation, proclaiming that physics has left the observational stage and entered the reasoning stage, trying an incomplete but confident experimental verification falsification, recognizing mathematics into other disciplines and becoming a necessary tool... and giving those who study mathematics a great reminder: If you don’t summarize things like differential integrals, you will not be able to keep up with the needs of the times.

What is important is not the formula copied, but a way of thinking that can move forward on your own. This sensational experiment made Chen Jian convinced that he started from the quality of philosophy definition in his uterus instead of copying formulas and pretending to be a charlatan. He had already begun to give him back.

As for the second extremely important thing he thinks is perhaps even more important and complicated than this matter, but for the time being, the sensation is far less than a single incident.

Just like the story of the five cakes and two fish he heard a few days ago, as the saying goes, ignorant people are fearless, and those who just know a little are often blindly confident. The more they know, the more they will realize the grandeur of nature...

Those students thought the story of Wubiao was too ridiculous because they had just learned the indoctrination of chemistry that still belonged to the category of philosophy and worldview, so they believed that they were not far from the so-called God.

Those who truly devote themselves to these disciplines know that even if Chen Jian's system and worldview are correct, Wubiao's affairs are simply fantasy and insurmountable deep grooves. These systems declare the end of the alchemy era and the arrival of the era of combination and decomposition, but do not explain the boundary between life and death.

As for the world view of material immortality, some people kept trying to do some experiments to overthrow it, but it was soon refuted by Chen Jian's supporters that Chen Jian is now a scholar, monopolizing the right to speak for many things, and has a lot of money to support it. He also promoted the enlightenment chemistry textbooks he wrote in schools controlled by Minjun, and naturally there were many supporters.

There are three types of opponents.

A statement that an opponent has no evidence and directly criticizes Chen Jian is pure nonsense and completely contrary to traditional cognition. How can matter be immortal? How can the soul not determine matter?

After several refutations, another opponent finally realized that if you want to kill Chen Jian's system from the root, you can only find loopholes in Chen Jian's system. They are in line with Chen Jian's pursuit of a supporter of the university valve: a more accurate balance. As long as the precise balance appears and an experiment after an accurate balance can be used to defeat Chen Jian's logical system, thereby completely overturning the law of immortality of matter.

There are also some opponents who hope to correct Chen Jian's theory to ensure that their worldview of soul and matter binary supports Chen Jian's theory to some extent, but correct it within the theory, so as to prove that matter does not constitute the entire world alone, and there is an insurmountable and puzzling gap between life and non-life, and this gap is something related to souls or creatures that have not been seen at this time.

The three oppositions have different ways of opposing each other. The first one naturally ignores it, the second one is far away, but the third one has a considerable impact after Chen Jian left.

The experimenter supported some of Chen Jian's theories and based on the theory proposed by Chen Jian, he conducted an experiment that found the loopholes in Chen Jian's theory.

Chen Jian gave the glory of the effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on plant growth to Mr. Mu, the guide who has become a scholar, and the perfect comparison test proved that this result was correct.

So, my senior brother from the chemistry department has died in the attempt to make hydrogen fluoride produced by using concentrated sulfuric acid and apatite.

According to Chen Jian's theory of substance immortality, since plants need nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, mature plants must contain nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. This is not a problem. Wood ash originally contains potassium carbonate, which has been played with for hundreds of years. The remaining two opposing people cannot find evidence that they do not exist. Supporters sprayed back the matter of wood ash containing potassium, so they could not open a breakthrough in this.

However, some people raised this question: If matter is immortal and conservative, the world is really just a recombination of particles as Chen Jian said. Then carbonic acid gas and water can be produced after the plant is incinerated.

Then removing the presence of oxygen in the air can prove that there must be charcoal and hydrogen in the plants, and it is not clear whether there is oxygen.

Hydrogen is easy to explain. Plants need to be watered to grow. Plants cannot survive without watering, so regardless of whether there is oxygen or not, the problem of hydrogen can be solved.

But what about carbon? Where does carbon come from?

When fertilizing plants, there is no need to apply charcoal. I originally thought that wood ash contains plants, so it can promote the growth of plants, but according to Chen Jian's statement, potassium chloride or potassium carbonate has the same effect. Therefore, the existence of carbon in wood ash is eliminated.

The questioner then heated and burned the sand and soil of the plant to determine that there was no carbon in the sand and the clarified lime water did not become turbid after heating. Then the gravel that could be confirmed to be free of carbon and the prepared fertilizer were cultivated in the plant, which ensured that the plants did not obtain carbon from the roots.

So the opponents of the first two factions were excited and believed that this incident completely reversed the situation. Chen Jian's system was obviously wrong. If it was really a recombination of matter and an inseparable thing was inconvertible, then where did the carbon in the plants come from? If the plants can transform carbon, is it not impossible to alchemy? But everyone hasn't found a way?

However, the faction that wanted to make corrections took the initiative to help Chen Jian find out the loopholes in this experiment, believing that this experiment did not take into account the existence of carbonic acid gas in the air.

Their school probably understands that Chen Jian's system is afraid that it is round inside and basically cannot refute it logically. Instead of wasting time on direct overturning, it is better to go deep into the internal correction. They can admit that matter is immortal and conservative, but they can find the gap between birth and death, so as to complete the concept of the existence of mysterious plants such as creatures or personality souls under the premise of immortality of matter.

It's not a collapse, it's just a correction.

The third opposition not only designed an experiment in which plants can obtain carbonic acid from the air, but also verified one thing: plants absorb carbonic acid during the day and emit oxygen at night.

The statement of plant respiration was proposed within Chen Jian's microparticle system. The vivid, detailed and irrefutable experiments made this person gain a high reputation.

After gaining fame, he immediately began to correct Chen Jian's system.

He not only regards himself as Chen Jian's supporter and respects Chen Jian as his husband, but also takes advantage of Chen Jian's inability to answer at sea to write a sleek article to correct the system produced by Chen Jian in terms of worldview.

According to the immortal system of matter, whether there is life at the beginning of heaven and earth is meaningless, whether there is life or not. It is just a certain aggregation of particles. It may appear, or it may not appear, or it may be inevitable or accidental.

In this case, all the theory of heaven and earth personality, soul theory, life theory, and life theory of the gap between life and death have lost their dominance from the world view.

This is something that many people cannot accept, and it is absolutely unacceptable.

However, if matter is immortal, but life has been born from the beginning of the world, there is an insurmountable gap between the living and the inanimate one. Whether it is personality, soul, spirit of all things, etc., it can become inconsistent with Chen Jian's system.

Indeed, matter is immortal, but there is a gap between living things that cannot be crossed. The immortality of matter is, but life is already destined. Life belongs to matter but is different from matter, so matter is not primary for humans.

The living things are higher than the living things. The living things can be divided into everything according to the theory of material immortality, or the living things can be transformed into living things, but this process is irreversible. The reason why it is irreversible is that there is something mysterious that exists since the beginning of the world and is closely related to life and soul.

Basically, at this point, the opposition who had scolded this person before understood the good intentions of this person. They suddenly felt that they could support each other to fight against Chen Jian's system. They admitted that Chen Jian's system "maybe there is some truth, but it is obviously imperfect" and stood up for that person with great fanfare.

Looking down, this is nothing, or just a chemistry or botany thing.

But in fact, this is a worldview dispute, and it is also the chemical basis of material first nature and materialistic atheism: the struggle between the world-class and the personal world-class. There is a dispute over whether the personality worldview is life.

After some sensation, the man used Chen Jian's book "Summary and Logical Deduction" to slap Chen Jian in the face now. There is no experiment yet to overcome biological and non-birth, so his statement may not be correct or wrong, but it is definitely wrong to say that he is wrong. Don't you talk about logic? If you talk about logic, you can't say what I said is wrong, unless you really create a life. If you don't talk about logic, all your systems will collapse incorrectly.
Chapter completed!