Chapter 1371 Species Evolution

Brofee then came up with another key discovery: one of the boulders illuminated the galactic center—[] Its straight line marked the rise of the galactic center during the chun season around 17,700 BC. Surprisingly, the direction of the galactic surface in the statue is consistent with this lunar period.

Therefore, Brofe concluded that this stone statue is a galaxy map with the extreme observation point of silver north.

Then he turned his attention to the second pile of stones dug out by Wendorf's group. Similarly, they found no bodies in this pile.

The size and placement of this pile of stones shows that it is a map of Andromeda galaxy, and statistics show that it is twice the size of the Milky Way, and its position is consistent with the size and position of the Andromeda galaxy we know.

As for several other piles of stones in Nabtabuna, they have not been excavated yet...

Brofe also conducted a Duli study on Giza, and here he also found evidence that the designers of Giza also knew about the Ginocence. Brofe's powerful software allowed him to refine the relevant periods of the Great Pyramid estimated by Robert Bowal.

He agreed to the famous starlight passage as a marker that the period of the Ri can be determined by a narrow mouth. When Brofi studied the sky in Giza, he found that the best axis alignment that has ever appeared here was around 2360 BC, about half a century later than the period of the Ri determined by Bowal.

Bowal believes that when the pyramid was being built, the passage on the south wall of the King's Funeral was aligned with the Orion constellation. But Brofe discovered that the last star on the belt of Orion, Betelgeuse, was aimed at the southern constellation more than a century ago.

When the pyramid was built, the starlight passage in the south was aimed at the center of the Ginderma, which also supported his discovery in Nabtabuna.

Assuming that the buildings on the Giza Highlands were a mirror of the Orion galaxy, when did this happen? Boval speculated that the Ri period was 10,500 BC, when Orion Samsung reached the south during the 26,000-year precession cycle. This was much earlier than the actual construction of the pyramid.

When Brofee tested this view, he discovered another aspect of this complex problem. He found that the ground in Giza reflects the sky at two points in time, 11772 BC and 9420 BC.

Brofee believed that the construction of the pyramid did not reflect the time when Orion was at the south of Samsung, as Bowal speculated, but included the entire process of the formation of this phenomenon. These two periods also included another important event, around 11,000 BC, the Glacial Heart was at the north.

In other words, Giza was built into a zodiac clock that reflects the precession cycle in the stones and ground. This supports the idea that the astronomy of the site was far earlier than the actual construction of the pyramid.

Brophy was fully aware of the revolutionary xing of his views. Therefore, he wisely did not make the final conclusion in the book. He simply regarded his discovery as a hypothesis and then suggested that others carry out further research.

Fortunately, most of his views are testable.

So far, only twenty-five Nabtabuna boulders have been identified through the global satellite positioning system, and only two of the at least thirty piles of stones have been excavated. It is suspected that over time, it will tell us more information about humans.

When most of us humans cannot accept the existence of ancient civilizations or supernatural civilizations, how much do we accept technology?

This makes many real history look like a myth now. The existence of ancient civilizations makes it difficult for this generation of humans bound by traditional education to believe that it is necessary to reject technology again.

Similar to Montauk Engineering, energy technology, Mars immigration, alien agreements, etc.

For example, acetone and ultrasound can be the way to produce nuclear fusion, which will make nuclear fusion no longer costly and cost millions of dollars tokamak magnetically controlled containers. It will only be done on a desktop.

Sound fusion is a word that produces, which means "nuclear fusion produced from sound". Of course, this word only partially summarizes the truth of the matter.

Acoustic fusion is an emerging field of chemistry. The direct product of acoustic chemistry mainly comes from a special phenomenon, acoustic luminescence.

Under certain temperature and pressure conditions, bombarding an appropriate liquid, such as acetone, will produce acoustic luminescence.

Sound waves cause small bubbles to be produced, just like those bubbles produced by a toothbrush when we brush our teeth. The difference is that these bubbles contain huge energy.

When these bubbles burst, some of their energy will be released into light, which is the origin of the name of this phenomenon, sound-induced luminescence.

The concept of acoustic fusion comes from the fact that during the acoustic luminescence process, very high temperatures and air pressure will form inside these bubbles. If deuterium elements that can undergo thermonuclear reactions are added to this medium, a hydrogen isotope.

Then use neutron pulses to rush the mixture that already has very strong pressure, which is enough to cause nuclear fusion reaction.

In general, this is sound fusion. However, this work is full of controversy, both before and after it is published.

Scientists like to describe themselves as the ever-evolving, open and casual exploration of the essence, structure and function of things, from small to poor, and their interactions with each other, from the simplest to the most complex, science is limited only by honesty, experiments, peer reviews, and repeatable experimental results.

This is the standard of scientific work described by "reputable scientists". They may not be scientific researchers in the true sense, but may just be a defender who abides by scientificism, insulting and slandering all phenomena and things explained by their "scientific teachings".

In fact, the staff of the Western medieval Holy See also did similar things.

Unfortunately, the world of science is like a combination of a super prison and a jing asylum.

At any time, scientism is defined based on some dogmatic views. To make this definition doubtful, the executors of the dogma further stated: Dogma is not there.

Schools will only teach truth in prescribed methods, three examples: the earth is flat, Ptolemy's astronomy, or Darwinism.

Heaven will help those who threaten the standard model, and now in most cases the self-esteem of authoritative scientific institutions is at work, and in the past it was often the decision of external security departments and religious courts, and sometimes it had fatal consequences. For example, Giordano Bruno, who was considered a lunatic by people at the time because of his insistence on the theory of ri-mindedness and was sent to the stake.

In contemporary real life, science is a small follower of the state and economy, and it relies on the funding provided by both, as well as other types of support. They dominate everything, and science can only dance to their melody.

Because scientific work requires a lot of capital, it sometimes includes billions of equipment, expensive academic and engineering talents, and a large number of expensive experimental equipment and supplies.

Since Hitler, it has become a tradition and convention for the state to preside over large-scale scientific research projects. They are the largest investors in science. They not only hire a large number of scientists in several institutions and laboratories, but also fund the development of commercial and industrial science and technology, but also fund the basic research.

The result is to cultivate a large number of docile and tame scientists, rather than autonomous explorers with the divine god Duli. The work of these scientists is to make no mistakes, to make bosses happy, to keep their organizations free from other illegal forces, to develop their careers, and to expand their organizations.

The same is true for this management organization. Why is it bloated? Why are people floating? Because you can't find someone who makes mistakes, people who dare to take responsibility. The situation in a certain era is even worse. Most domestic education comes from traitors, slaves, etc.

Among these many responsibilities, today they have focused on another one, which is to protect their patents from research supported by taxpayers.

Such an atmosphere is obviously not conducive to cultivating open investigation spirit and sharing of knowledge. Rules such as security rating, commercial secrets, and patent protection, which are constantly involved, may have made this atmosphere worse.

Scientists who oppose this system, or who actually ask questions, are under control of these forces. They will be delisted from attending professional meetings or prohibited from hosting meetings themselves.

They will be denied their progress; their works will not be published, banned informally, removed from scientific organizations, criticized, or fired, or even bad.

The most radical scientists are always threatened and intimidated, their laboratories are illegally invaded or destroyed, and they may even be assassinated. Some of them are imprisoned, while others' works and experimental equipment are confiscated and destroyed.

The more basic scientific discoveries are and the more breakthrough they have, the greater the threat they will be and the more intense the bombing they will be. In such an attack, the power of the media, scientific groups and the masses is the most important.

Vested interests in society, including political leaders and large capitalists, usually dominate who wins and loses in scientific wars, and also dominate the reputation of both sides of the victory and defeat. This is why controlling the publishing and journalism is so important.

In the Chinese Federation, the difference between most public schools and private schools is here. Public schools are funded by the state and tuition fees are exempted, but the problem is the content and results of education.

Most students don’t even know what politeness is, what science is, what true knowledge is, and what quality is. They just receive so-called quality education that is plausible and then become ideal pawns, parts, and cannon fodder for the court.

If a scientist or a scientific organization in any part of the world decides to verify a specific scientific hypothesis, they will carefully use experiments that can be used to confirm this hypothesis, or first record all the data of this hypothesis in meticulously.

The findings, positive and negative views will also be presented in formal scientific papers. Of course, usually, the premise for such experiments to be completed must be subject to internal investigations by various institutions.

The paper is then submitted to the editors of scientific journals in the field related to the discovery. The editor then sends the paper to a group of relevant scientists who are usually anonymous to the public.

.duyidu.

Read it

This group of scientists will review the paper, and they will check whether it is in line with the solid work of science, whether it has the correct structure and experimental data. Whether the identifiable tendencies and errors of the paper have been explained, etc. The main reason is that they need to clearly see if there are any violations of the rules.

This group of scientists' comments will eventually be fed back to the editor, and the editor will decide whether to refuse to publish, or ask the author to modify partially, or publish the full text.

Once you get the consent, it will be published. This is the whole process, and other publications are similar.

Charles Darwin was full of enthusiasm for observing nature and studied the origin of all things deeply. He set off a revolution in biology. The "Origin of Species" he wrote is basically a knowledge category that is very keen on in most countries in the world.

Ma Ke Di is a keen social observer. He also has seriously thought about the origin of species. This great man revolutionized economics and political science. These two people were both "giants" of the 19th century. They have a profound impact on later generations. At the same time, they both deeply agree with dialectical materialism.

Materialism believes that matter is the only subject of change, and all changes are the result of the inherent internal contradictions of things.

In certain specific eras, materialist dialectics has a great attraction to intellectuals and the working class, and in fact it has been questioned, especially in the recent century.

Darwinism began to be in a similar dilemma. It was not just because creationists sounded the death knell for it, but Darwin himself was also very aware of the flaws of evolution.

Darwin once called the origin of flowering plants a "hate puzzle", and this puzzle has not been solved yet.

To solve this "disgusting puzzle", scientists spent hundreds of years searching for fossil remains, trying to discover the missing link between non-flowering plants and flowering plants.

Unfortunately, a large number of doubts emerged in the process like bamboo shoots after the rain. Darwin had expected the problems caused by the vacancies of the transitional fossils. He wrote at that time: "This is the most serious problem that can overturn the entire theory."

This is definitely not as simple as a missing link.

With the advancement of science and technology, a biochemist became one of the pioneers in subverting evolution. His name is Michael Bach, a biology professor. He wrote the book "Darwin's Black Box".

In the book, Bach pointed out that a strange bubble brewing phenomenon occurred in the test tube.

He concentrated on analyzing the following five phenomena: blood blotting, eyelashes, human immune system, the transmission of substances in cells, and synthetic nucleotides.

He systematically analyzed each phenomenon and came to a shocking conclusion: these systems are so complex that the gradual, step-by-step evolutionary path claimed by evolution cannot reach this level at all.

The basis of evolution theory is very simple, maybe too simple. Its theoretical basis is that the evolution of life on Earth is achieved through a series of biological changes, and these biological changes are the result of the joint action of natural selection and random gene mutations.

As time goes by, one organism gradually becomes another organism. In the process of adapting to environmental changes, the most suitable population survives and reproduces, while the unadapted population gradually disappears.

This forms the most famous principle of evolution theory: survival of the fittest.

For example, today's humans, your brain, internal organs, digestive systems, and even toes evolved from simple randomness at the beginning, from the simplest to complex, then this earth is too perfect, perfectly creating randomly born humans, transformed from monkeys. The question is, is this assumption valid?

Just like many great ideas, Darwin's theory of evolution is extremely simple. He observed that all species are mutating, some are bigger, some are smaller, some are fatter, some are shallower, etc.

Darwin believed that because the limited food method satisfies all living things, then those species with strong vitality will have the opportunity to survive and reproduce through struggles.

If a species has genetic xing, then the species will change after a period of time. The larger the time interval, the greater the change.

For more than a century, most scientists believe that all living things, at least all of them, are actually derived from natural selection through random mutations.

Darwin's thoughts have always been used to explain the beaks of birds, horse hooves, moths, insect slaves, the distribution of organisms on the earth and the age of organisms.

His theory has even been used by some scientists to explain human behavior, such as why desperate people commit suicide, why teenagers have children without marriage, why some students have better intelligence test scores than other students, and why religious priests refuse to get married and have children, etc.

All organisms, all thoughts, all feelings and thoughts, do not become the subject matter of evolution.

Evolutionary biology has made great progress in the types of organisms we can see around us for nearly a century and a half.

For many, this progress seems to be a complete victory, but as far as animals or organic matter are concerned, the work of truly studying biological is not yet begun.

The most important part of a living organism is still very small, and people can see that there are many tiny things in a living organism, and the molecules related to the tiny things in the living organism are molecules. To be continued.)
Chapter completed!