Font
Large
Medium
Small
Night
Prev Index    Favorite Next

The first thousand three hundred and sixty-two chapters of human origin

Chapter 1362: The Origin of Humanity

Rothschild, who was also a member of the international banking family that opposed Parker's excavation of Temple Mount in 1910, refused to accept the photos, which were kept by Claust in his home in Winfield, Kansas, and he still refused to let people see them, but only selected visitors.

Later, a visitor who was lucky enough to see those photos was the respected archaeologist Siegfried Horn, an expert in the Nebo region, and authored more than a dozen academic works.

He spent some time examining the photos taken by Klaust, and unfortunately the flushing quality of those photos was terrible: there was nothing on them except two of them "" updated the fastest full text by hand

Among the two images, one was very blurry, but it did take a stone chamber and another one of the yellow boxes in the center. The front of the box was taken very clearly.

As soon as Hoss left Klaust's house, he drew a sketch of the box based on the reversal film he had just seen. He believed that some of the metal parts outside the box were brass rather than gold; not only that, the diamonds inlaid on the box seemed to be machined.

""

Watch the latest chapter

However, the most criticized thing so far is that the nail on the box actually has a modern nail head, which protrudes from the upper right corner of the front of the box, and Hen concluded: I don’t know what that thing is, but these photos made me firmly believe that it is not an ancient handmade product, but a modern artifact, with machine-processed decorative stripes and a thin metal core inside.

From fiction to reality, after studying the records of Jerusalem archaeology, no other information has been found to indicate that other people have conducted excavations and adventures to verify the legends of the Jews about the place where the Ark of the Covenant was finally placed.

Scholars interviewed all believe that this information is indeed very limited: Charles Valen, and later Mel Bendorf and his inspection team have all excavated the Temple Mountains, although their purpose is not to find a covenant.

Although Montegu Bronsrow Parker had excavated the interior of the Temple Mount, he found nothing

Antonia Friedlic Voter believed that the ark was hidden in Mount Nebo, and indeed found a secret passage in Mount Nebo but did not continue to investigate it

Finally, Tom Claust claimed to have found the real Ark of the Covenant in a passage, but the passage moved from Mount Nebo to Mount Piga less than 50 years after it was discovered by Voltel.

As people often say, these are the ones who have caused sensation and pursued the Ark of the Covenant that have either believed in the Savior or the frivolous weirdo.

The missing ark is not in the places mentioned in Jewish legends. The ark has neither been taken away by the Egyptians nor by the Babylonians nor has it been destroyed.

So, the disappearance of the Ark of the covenant is becoming more and more like a confusing mystery. As Richard Elliot Friedman, professor of Hebrew and Comparative Religion at the University of California, said, it is "a great mystery in the Bible."

The Ethiopians say that they have the ark of the covenant, and the basis for this statement is actually very fragile, just like the "False Book of Palu" or "Magabi"

"The King's Glory" always says that the Queen of Sheba is an Ethiopian. She and King Solomon had a son and later abducted the Ark of the Covenant from Jerusalem. But these statements are more like bizarre fiction than simple facts.

To be precise, a lot of evidence was found in Ethiopia, and a lot of persuasive evidence, which indeed strongly supported the view that the Ark of the covenant might be really in the chapel of the Ark of Aksum City.

Any familiar history of the Ark of the Covenant knows that from the moment it was created in the foothills of Sinai, until it disappeared from the temple of Solomon, the Ark of the Covenant was indeed a holy object that was extremely valued by the Jewish people.

In fact, the Bible seems to have completely forgotten the Ark of the Covenant after Solomon and no one can be sure where the Ark of the Covenant was hidden, and why did the Old Testament writers let the Ark of the Covenant disappear from this sacred scripture?

It didn't pass through a big explosion as people might imagine, but disappeared quietly?

There are even signs in the Bible that the ark of the covenant was forced to be removed from the temple, which may be the result of some mass protest against the king. He cruelly suppressed the protest.

This is certainly just a guess, but this assumption helps explain a Bible statement about Manasseh, that he “shewed a lot of innocent blood and filled Jerusalem from here to there”

In any case, one thing is clear: Manasseh was regarded as a stranger who was terrified of bad character and mental health at the end of his reign.

In 642 B.C., his son Ammon inherited his throne, and Josiah inherited the throne of Ammon in 640 B.C. King Josiah was a passionate reformer who restored his traditional worship of the Lord, and was famous for his love for the Bible authors.

Why was King Ammon so short in his reign?

The Bible explains that because Ammon did what he saw as evil in the eyes of the Lord, he did everything his father did, and he respected the idols he worshiped...

The servants of King Ammon betrayed him and killed him in the palace, but the people killed those who betrayed King Ammon, and made his son Josiah to reign as king.

However, when Josiah ascended the throne at the age of eight, according to the Bible, Josiah had already shown signs of “seeking the God of his father David” at the age of eight.

In fact, it was not until 12 years after the young king ascended the throne that he began to fiercely deny the sins of Manasseh and Ammon. When King Josiah was 20 years old, he launched a movement to "clean Judea and Jerusalem, and to get rid of carved and cast images."

From the temple of the Lord, he moved the idol of the tree of divine to the stream of Jerusalem, burned and crushed it into ashes, and scattered the ashes on the hilt of the common people.

This is really a violent remedy! Not only that, the movement has a precise date to check: the disgusting idol of Manasseh in 628 BC was finally cleared from the inner temple of the temple by one root.

However, the Ark of the Covenant was naturally not taken back and could not replace the idol's position.

Two years later, Jeremiah announced his prophecy to the people to alleviate their sorrows of the disappearance of the Ark of the Covenant Jeremiah prophesied that the day when people no longer ask "where is the Ark of the Lord?" will come at that time, and people will no longer feel that the ark is missing, and they will no longer consider re-creating an ark.

In the middle of a certain wood, the real ark of the covenant was placed. The golden ark made in the foothills of Sinai was once carried over the wilderness, once carried across the Jordan River, and once brought them victory in the battle between the Israelites to capture the land of Enxa. Once brought to Jerusalem by King David around 955 BC, it was once placed in the inner temple of the First Temple by King Solomon

From there, it was safely sent by faithful priests to the island of Elefatan in distant Egypt, lest be defiled at the hands of King Manasseh.

A new temple was built on the island of Elefattan to house it, which lasted for two centuries

However, after the temple was destroyed, it began a series of wanderings again. It was taken to Ethiopia in the south and entered the land under the shadow of the locust wings. The land crisscrossed with rivers.

It was sent from one island to another, to the turquoise island of Tanachix. It was placed in a simple tent to receive worship from the rustic people

In the next 800 years, it became the core of a unique group of Jews worship, who were the ancestors of all Ethiopian Jews today

Later, Christians entered Ethiopia and spread this new religion. After converting the king, they occupied Aksum and sent the ark to Aksum and put it into the magnificent church they built there. The church was dedicated to the Virgin Mary.

After many years and centuries, the memory of how the Ark of the covenant came to Ethiopia gradually blurred the legend began to become popular, saying that a mysterious and unexplained strange thing has now appeared: a small town on the plateau of the distant Tigray Province was chosen as the last place for the most precious and noblest holy object of the Old Testament era.

These legends were eventually recorded in words and written as "The King's Glory". There are many errors in the document "The King's Glory", which has made future scholars unable to see the ancient and secret historical truths, because they are hidden under the numerous myths and magic.

However, the Templars found out the truth, that is, the early Freemasons, who understood the power of the ark of the covenant, and went to Ethiopia to find the ark of the covenant.

Not only that, their search was also written by Wolfram von Tubach, the legendary story of "Pasifal", and the Holy Grail was regarded as the mysterious code of the Ark of the Covenant.

Wolfram wrote in this legend: The pagan Fretjetanis understood the secrets of the constellations and declared in awe that there was indeed "a thing called the Holy Grail" in the world. He also announced: A group of Christian descendants are guarding this perfect Holy Grail, this invisible Holy Grail; those descendants live a pure life

He finally made a prophecy: "Those who are called to the Holy Grail will always be respectable."

The above is an exploration of the Ark of the Covenant, the core item of Western civilization. This is not just a simple archaeological study, but involves the origin of human beings and the roots of early religious civilizations.

Faith is not something nihilistic, and the world itself is not as materialistic Darwinian evolution as most people know, as well as the so-called progressive human society, and the views of ancient civilizations, there are many misunderstandings.

Ignorance is not scary. What is scary is that you blindly believe or deny something, but give up your own thinking and search for knowledge and truth.

In various fields of religion, you will not find any trace of Darwin's "Evolution". In fact, you can tell by just thinking a little and having some reasoning ability.

Using the determination of the degree of molecular differences between plasma proteins, it was found that humans were closest to the current great ape black ape. About 40 million years ago, humans and great ape black ape broke up.

But strangely, after 40 million years, there has been almost no obvious change in the Great Ape and the Black Ape. It will always belong to a primate mammal. Judging from the current evolutionary level, it will not evolve into Homo sapiens or modern people in another 40 million years.

Why is only human evolution so rapidly?

On the other hand, where does human being come from, who is human beings, and how many people have thought about these questions?

Every day, I only care about food, clothing, housing and transportation, and have no ideals and pursuits. What do you think is the difference between you and or in a farm?

Currently, there are basically four major human races on Earth, white, yellow, black and brown. If the theory of evolution is correct, then these four types of people should evolve from four apes.

However, evolutionists asserted that evolution from ape to humans is a natural accident. There is only one ape on Earth that has evolved into humans, so it is impossible for it to adapt to the evolution of primates in general. This is a contradictory statement in itself.

Since at least four kinds of apes can evolve into humans, why do other apes still remain apes after millions of years, and there is no tendency to evolve into humans?

Even Darwin himself said that his Theory of Evolution is just a hypothesis-based biological science research.

That is, in science, knowledge is merely hypothetical, which makes a group of stupid professors tell children about evolution as a certain fact. How ignorant is this?

Of course, some people have raised questions. The skin color can be mutated. Why does these types of wormwood change? How do we not turn green in this kind of wormwood? How do we decide the four skin colors of humans? If it is an accidental mutation, why do people with the same skin color form the same region and the same skin color?

Moreover, what is the relationship between this variation and natural survival?

If human skin color is inherited naturally, have we discovered apes with these four colors?

The hypothesis of the origin of humans is not only Darwin's family, but also the hypothesis that humans originated from aliens. It is the latest hypothesis in the West in recent years. It was proposed by Western scientist Mattis. Its basis is a skull fossil discovered in San Diego.

After studying this skull, he believed that the intelligence of the human race represented by this skull is far higher than that of humans today, so he speculated that this was the remains of an alien, and then proposed the hypothesis that human ancestors were aliens.

He believes that about 50,000 years ago, a group of aliens came to Earth and had a high degree of intelligence. When they found that the gravity environment of the Earth was not suitable for them to live, they chose the energetic and intellectual female apes on Earth to cross. This is our ancestors of humans.

However, the Huaxia Federation does not agree with this statement. At least the ethnic groups of the Chinese system do not necessarily have the same roots as those of other skin color groups.

However, the research in this regard is still worthy of recognition and understanding. Three anthropologists from Spain and Russia conducted preliminary research on these two mummies, believing that the remains of not humans are not human.

Anthropologists were puzzled after seeing the strange features of these skulls. Researchers were preparing to DNA identification of residues in the right eye socket to determine whether the wreck belongs to humans.

The second mummy is not complete, has no face, its length is about 30 cm, and it seems to be wrapped in something outside, in the posture of the fetus curling in the uterus

"Three anthropologists from Spain and Russia have arrived at the museum not long ago to start studying the two mummies, and they agree that this does not belong to the remains of human beings... Although the current assessment is still rough, it is obvious that their characteristics do not match any human race on Earth," said Rikelm.

This is of course just a hypothesis at present. Some scientists have proposed the hypothesis that humans originated from post-organisms based on evidence that human surface characteristics are very close to post-organisms.

Recently, some people advocated the "Big Four Seasons" saying that based on the fact that the solar system constantly moves around the Milky Way, they assume that the solar system rotates around the Milky Way center and the earth will change four seasons, which is called the "Big Four Seasons".

In the exchange of four seasons, humans constantly change their survival methods according to changes in the natural environment.

For example, when summer comes, the earth becomes a pure water planet. In order to adapt to this change, humans slowly transform from terrestrial animals into aquatic animals. This is why the human body has post-biological characteristics.

When summer ends and autumn comes, the water on the earth gradually fades away, and humans transform from post-birth organisms into land organisms

In fact, before the modern hypothesis about the origin of human beings was proposed, human ancestors began to pursue the answer to this question

Long before the text appeared, more than 6,000 AD, the ancestors of human beings proposed an ancient hypothesis of origin of human beings: it was the omnipotent God who created the ancestors of human beings, and the ancestors who created us all living beings.

Unfortunately, this view has now been buried in the name of science hundreds of years ago. Theocracy defeated science. Now science defeated theocracy. Human beings have always moved from one superficial to another. Only a few people have the vision and qualities of scholars and can conduct reasonable research and analysis of things.

In the Bible. Gospel of Mark, Jesus said: "The Son of Man comes from the clouds and brings great power and light." German linguist Father Smit noted that in the religion of the Indo-European nation, the roots of the word God or the word God are all illuminating (to be continued)
Chapter completed!
Prev Index    Favorite Next