It can be inferred that angels and demons who use human souls to supplement their members and play with souls are naturally hostile to them.

 Let’s return to the topic of Inarius’s “death”.

There is no choice in who the person who rebels against "father" is in the book, because it cannot be done by the current Nephalem who does not know how many generations of descendants he is.

So Inaris's bones were worn by Rathma and were named "The Grace of Inaris".

Rasma is against fate, and even wants to control fate.

So Rasma has the power to manipulate fate in the book.

So where is the other part?

Vasily.

This child who was protected by fate, and the savage who was directed by fate.

 There are records in the sources that Vasily and the first Bulkesso lived together for a long time.

 So their positions are similar, at least initially.

Since there is a clear record of the separation of the family, I set the attitude of the first generation Bulkeso to be hostile to fate.

 Thus, while the barbarians enjoy the help of fate (they have prophets), they are also tricked by fate (the prophets will also die in battle).

 …

 Unknowingly, I said a lot, but fortunately it was just some silly author’s creative process and personal opinions on Diablo.

 There are no spoilers anywhere, which is okay.

Good night everyone, I'm going to bed early.

  It’s a new month, come on!
Chapter completed!