Are the demons humans of the past?

And are humans in the paradise artificial humans?

So......

What is a paradise?

Petri dish, culture tank?

Following the perspectives of creation and association, Yao Yan set up a bridge in the "park" and "cultivation tank".

If you start thinking again and think about the elements corresponding to the world's worldview from the perspective of creation and association, then there is only one last step left.

Find "park".

If the paradise is not an entity and has no history of ruins, then it may be the real world, a certain history of the "main world".

According to his previous theory, a trial space can be divided into two parts.

One part can be described as "setting", which corresponds to the world view of the spiritual source, or it can be said to be "original". These origins are unreasonable.

If the spiritual person believes that the world is round, then the world is round. If the spiritual person believes that the world is square, then the world will be square.

This is the "framework".

Another part is "continuation", which corresponds to the "setting" of the world view of those who are spiritually sourced, as the beginning and then continue to develop. These developed things are different from the "framework" and have no absolute coercive force.

Take the previous world of sunstone as an example.

The development of language itself cannot be achieved overnight, and various social influences will leave traces on language.

And through the traces themselves, problems can be found.

If you have not experienced the Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China, then you will not like to use "having a good person" when speaking...

From a linguistic perspective, isolated languages, sticky languages, and inflection languages ​​will develop towards another type of development with time. However, the same isolated languages ​​have different languages, language word order and usage habits, word source allusions, etc.

If there are one, two, three, sticky words, abc, and inflection words, 123, then the adhesion of the isolated words can be a, b or c, and the adhesion of the adhesion of the adhesion can be a1, a2, a3.

These changes are like gene sequences, and their changes themselves are recorded in language.

a1, b3...

This is just a simplified description when removing most variables.

Isolated words will naturally become sticky, but the time is long and short, and the degree of sticky words and sentences will be different.

At this time, if another civilization breaks in due to economic exchange or conquest, then the local language will be affected.

Some isolated languages ​​are only transformed by foreign language habits after being glued.

Some isolated languages ​​are just beginning or halfway through, and are transformed by foreign language habits.

Or, in turn, a language completes inflection and reversal is returned to adhesion.

The languages ​​he is used to, such as isolated words, have a great influence on semantics.

I love you and I love me, the meaning of you and I love is different.

A strict structure is required.

But like Japanese, I love you, you love you and I love you and I love all the same.

These language habits themselves, the grammar, meaning of words, and pronunciation within these languages ​​are a historical record.

And the usage of language will also affect people's habits

If the word that expresses whether to judge is placed at the end of the sentence, taking "I want to kill you, no", as an example, people will be accustomed to speaking after listening to the sentence.

This kind of language habit will lead to a person's personality becoming more patient or more insidious, and the habit of making jokes will also change.

As the other party and the third party, different situations will occur.

However, as far as Yao Yan knows, these knowledge are already relatively backward theories.

Although it is not outdated, the lack of other theories as supplements can have a great impact on itself.

A person's thinking habits, his memories, and his worldview will also be influenced by language habits.

All things and experiences a person has are not isolated.

People are used to simplifying and to omit what they think is "unnecessary" and "can be omitted".

But what is even more terrifying is that they often do not know what the simplified behavior is when they perform simplified behaviors.

This itself is also the "optimal structure" formed by the human body in order to reduce unnecessary energy consumption.

If you have to go through all the nouns in detail every time you think, although it can ensure relatively high accuracy, it is time-consuming and laborious.

Is the survival of the fittest the best, other elimination, or one of the best, one of the best, one of the best, one of the best, one of the best?

The fact is that an injured person lost money when he passed by. When people saw the scene tracing backward, they thought that someone was robbed of money and injured.

Yao Yan is very cautious.

He knew that if the details of the judgment and traceability of "park" were wrong, then his understanding of real history would gradually deviate with the process step by step.

He needs to find clear enough clues.

If you find a dividing line that can tell whether it is "framework history" or "continuing history", then it is the best result.

But he would not hold any expectations.

The demons are now humans, and the humans are now artificial humans?

A problem arose.

What criteria does "human" use to judge?

Is it a judgment of origin or is it a criterion for judgment at this stage?

To use an example, "Emperor".

The earliest emperor was the emperor. Are the other follow-up emperors not?

If the subsequent emperor is also an emperor, then an invisible preset and standard will appear-

"Emperor, is it the only one?"

"Is human, unique?"

This question is very important.

People are accustomed to simplifying the mind, logic and standards.

Black and white, light and dark, high and low...

"Apart from black, they are all white", not clear enough.

"Apart from the bright ones, they are all dark ones", perhaps it can be explained more clearly.

This is a universal thinking inertia rooted in human thinking.

So, according to the theory of the formation of the world, whether "humanity" is unique is likely to be the core point that triggers conflicts in the worldview of this world.

If it is the world where the gene determines everything according to its origin...

The devil is the "orthodox".

To subvert thinking, habits, and a person’s worldview must start by subverting his “righteous” concept.

If so, then his choice would be-

Completely eliminate the demon.

Going further, other species can be turned into humans, into demons, and completely replace the position of "humans".

But if not, but just "has a human appearance or..."

"It looks similar, even humans"

Then, Yao Yan should choose to make the humanoid creatures in this world lose their humanoid form.
Chapter completed!