After finding the criminal, the professor asked the relevant departments for more funds, haha. The human nature of the film is still reflected through contrast.

Of course, I have to say that only Li Yi's movies dare to shoot like this!

When talking about human nature, we have to talk about ethics. "Moon" mainly discusses the human rights issue of human cloning, while this film can be understood as the human rights issue of vegetative people. If you dig deeper, the director is still asking: When a normal person loses his normal

After his death, should he still be respected?

When we respect people, what “human” rights are we respecting?

The male protagonist in this film is seriously injured and only has partial brain function left, but he can still produce complete thoughts.

In this case, using a machine to maintain vital signs in order to participate in the source code project in order to take advantage of the special characteristics of his body, is this looking at him as a human being? A guinea pig, or a machine with a mental implant?

Personally, I prefer to treat him as a human computer, and then let him complete the game goals in this computer, although this game is very...

After the criminal was found, the professor asked his subordinates to format his memory and prepare for other tasks in the future. What is the difference between this and completing a game, deleting it and replacing it with the next one? As the first participant of the source code project, you must know

The male protagonist himself died in a mission and ended up in a vegetative state, but who can guarantee that the memories of future participants in this plan will not be rewritten?

Maybe when he was doing future tasks, he was assigned an identity that was more conducive to doing tasks rather than investigating his own life experience. Yes, the biggest difference is that the player is the host, and how to play and what to play are determined by

For him, it is decided by a person who is like God, and he will not consider the feelings of the players at all when making the decision. In modern civilized society, freedom of thought is a very important aspect, and it is sacrosanct no matter where it is.

of.

The question is here, when a person's body fails, his spiritual freedom should still be respected. The current technology may not be able to skip the physical body and directly control the spirit, but what about the future? The director infiltrated in the film
Chapter completed!